Limited time offer




Is Wikipedia really a trusted resource?

Do you use Wikipedia as a trusted resource for information and background on a variety of topics? If you answered yes, you might want to rethink that. Wikipedia editors recently revealed that potential hundreds of their entries are paid ‘sockpuppet’ entries.  ‘Sockpuppet’ entries are fake, and used for promotional purposes – these are infact against Wikipedia’s policies.     Upon discovering these fake entries, Wikipedia have blocked and or banned more than 250 accounts, believed to be ‘Sockpuppet’ accounts. According to the Executive Editor, Sue Gardner “…these violate the core principles that have made Wikipedia so valuable for so many people”. So who could be behind these accounts? Wikipedia has shared they believe Silicon Valley dot-coms, doctors, and an oil company to be responsible. How can you help identify fake entries? ‘Sockpuppet’ account entries will have a promotional tone to them. You certainly won’t come across anything negative within these reports. Have you come across any suspicious Wikipedia reports? Tell us!
Filed under: Tech News

Written by Kirsten Dunlaevy

Kirsten Dunlaevy is a blogger for BullGuard. With a background in advertising and branding she is extremely familiar with the ups and downs of social media and the world of communication. Kirsten is here to educate you on how to navigate all things digital, in a safe and responsible manner. Her other passions are decidedly un-digital, she loves being out on the water and cooking.

More articles by Kirsten Dunlaevy

Leave a Reply




Please enter the code

Please enter the captcha code!

Security code

Ranked #1 by industry experts

BullGuard Internet Security Cup

Internet Security

Free download
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse, we are assuming that you have no objection in accepting cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.